I am reading a section of Kierkegaard's Works of Love for Dr. Verhey's class. Had to remember this quote:
"Think of the most cultured person, one of whom we all admiringly say, 'he is so cultured!' Then think of Christianity, which says to him, 'You shall love the neighbor!' Of course, a certain social courtesy, a politeness toward all people, a friendly condescension toward inferiors, a boldly confident attitude before the mighty, a beautifully controlled freedom of spirit, yes, this is culture -- do you believe that it is also loving the neighbor?"
What a great thought on the danger of the appeal of popularity, fame, and culture. Pride has no place in God's command to love the neighbor. I am still wrestling with Kierk's idea that preference doesn't either. In a sense I think he is correct, but its hard to want to say that loving a friend more than an enemy is not wrong.
Another Luther Quote on Suffering
By testing and trying a man's patience, tribulation takes everything away from him and leaves him bare and naked; moreover, it does not let him find help and salvation in physical or spiritual merits, but it causes him to despair of everything created, to forsaken all creatures and himself, and, outside himself and everything else, to seek help in God alone and to sing the verse of the Psalm, 'But thou, O Lord, are a shiled for me, and my glory'(PS 3:3) This is what it means to hope and to become hopeful through testing trials." Lectures on Romans 5:5
Luther on Suffering
Luther in his lectures to the Romans makes an interesting argument about suffering. He says that suffering is the way in which God tests us, but that this testing is for our sake and not for God's. I am assuming the reason is because God will already know how the test will turn out, but the test itself changes us for the better. Here is an interesting quotation:
"Thus (with suffering soon after salvation) man learns to love and worship God unconditionally, ie, to worship him not for the sake of grace and its gifts but solely for his own sake." (160, Rom 5:4)
I find this an interesting and convicting idea. Why do we love God? Do we love him for the sake of his gifts? If cancer is discovered in our bodies tomorrow, will we still love God or will we reject him because he has no longer been good to us. I Luther has a point here that suffering does help purify our love for God, for it is in suffering where we see what it is about God that we love. Do we love God and his being and his character, or do we love God's benefits to us.
Luther also has another thread that is interesting. He says that suffering somehow keeps the flesh from controlling us. He sees a danger in that if we have too much pleasure, too easy of access to what we want, then the world will become appealing to us and lure us away from God. Again I think there is insight here. In our current context of America with easy access to food, shelter, and pleasure (entertainment) the lure of the world is strong. This is partly why I agree with the move that Christians need to give most of their possessions away (at least above a certain level of responsibility to family and self). If suffering is not imposed upon us by God, I would argue that it is a good idea to allow the things that would tempt us to still flow away from us to the world in a form of a blessing to those in need. That solves multiple problems. It removes our temptation, meets the needs of the world, and all of this is done in the name of God.
"Thus (with suffering soon after salvation) man learns to love and worship God unconditionally, ie, to worship him not for the sake of grace and its gifts but solely for his own sake." (160, Rom 5:4)
I find this an interesting and convicting idea. Why do we love God? Do we love him for the sake of his gifts? If cancer is discovered in our bodies tomorrow, will we still love God or will we reject him because he has no longer been good to us. I Luther has a point here that suffering does help purify our love for God, for it is in suffering where we see what it is about God that we love. Do we love God and his being and his character, or do we love God's benefits to us.
Luther also has another thread that is interesting. He says that suffering somehow keeps the flesh from controlling us. He sees a danger in that if we have too much pleasure, too easy of access to what we want, then the world will become appealing to us and lure us away from God. Again I think there is insight here. In our current context of America with easy access to food, shelter, and pleasure (entertainment) the lure of the world is strong. This is partly why I agree with the move that Christians need to give most of their possessions away (at least above a certain level of responsibility to family and self). If suffering is not imposed upon us by God, I would argue that it is a good idea to allow the things that would tempt us to still flow away from us to the world in a form of a blessing to those in need. That solves multiple problems. It removes our temptation, meets the needs of the world, and all of this is done in the name of God.
Seth Heringer
Seth Heringer is a Ph.D. candidate working on the practice of theological interpretation of Scripture. Questions about the nature of history and the role of the historical-critical method in exegesis also feature prominently in his studies.When not working on his dissertation. he serves as a freelance writer on technology. This interest in technology also appears in his choice of pleasure reading: mostly science fiction and fantasy. Aside from these, he enjoys getting outside to backpack and hike with his wife.
For more information you can view his Google Profile, follow him on Twitter @sethheringer, or contact him at gunpowderheaven@gmail.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)